Dennis Alcoreza & the Manila City Hall Councilors Tear Jerker Drama Against Alfredo Lim
Remember the saying you can’t fight City Hall? Everyone knows you can’t win fighting City Hall but what happens when the fight is within City Hall? Well that is exactly what is happening with Dennis Alcoreza & the Manila City Hall Councilors Tear Jerker Drama against Alfredo Lim over their “victim hood” portrayal giving Korean Tele-Novellas a run for their money. Who do you think will win? Will it be Alfredo Lim the Mayor or Dennis Alcoreza and his kuligs errr colleagues in the city council? Maybe the question should be who will lose instead of who will win because the losers are definitely the taxpaying public in the city of
Jokers indeed, the gallery was so fool errr full of drama with Dennis Alcoreza's kuligs errr colleagues resigning their committee membership which Itchie G. Cabayan of Journal Online thinks maybe a "moro-Moro" (a farce). According to the observations of UP-Manila students who were at the gallery during the break of the session that some staff of the councilors who were in the gallery that positions "vacated" will be filled up just the same during a subsequent "reorganization." In a "reorganization" wherein these same jokers will be voting among themselves to fill up the vacant positions serving as an opportunity to ease out those they "dislike."
For the latest Philippine news stories and videos, visit GMANews.TV
The “tear jerker” (Yeah, I am tearing up laughing so hard at how pathetic these people are, not out of sympathy) unfolded when city hall short on its budget started levying delinquent business establishments. One of the firms targeted was DEALCO Farms, Inc a family owned corporation of Delfin Alcoreza the father of Dennis Alcoreza who won a council cheat errr seat in the first district of Manila last May 14, 2007. DEALCO Farms, Inc. entered into a 25-year lease with the former city administration to rehabilitate and modernize the abattoir in Vitas, Tondo, a 22,000 square meter facility to maintain it in accordance with health and sanitation standards set by the National Meat Inspection Commission. Nothing unusual there except some violations of the contract here and there according to the
The drama with a flavor of victim mentality ala human rights “violation proportion” started when City Hall took over the facility for non-payment of taxes and contract violations such as the unsanitary conditions among other things to which the employees complied leaving the premises peacefully while Dennis Alcoreza and his wife together with DEALCO Farms, Inc. officers defied the order to vacate the facility was forcefully carried out and removed by the Police of the City of Manila.
What was the Manila Police thinking when they forcefully evicted DEALCO Farms, Inc. officers? Don’t they know that they are dealing with a cheating errr seating Council member of their city? Dennis Alcoreza and Joyce Alcoreza among the officers bodily carried out by the police complained to the Human Rights Commission. Exactly what is their beef? I have no clue especially when PO1 Efryl Rose Francisco and SPO1 Ruby Hilado of Station 1 said a medico-legal report showed they were stabbed with a ball pen, bitten and scratched by Dealco official Joyce Alcoreza as they escorted her out. There are real victims of human rights abuse out there and for these jokers to waste the time and resources of the commission only shows the pathetic state of the nation gone mad and incorrigible.
Going back to where it all started it appears according to the City Hall website that DEALCO, Farms Inc., violated the lease contract by transferring the lease of the facility to Meatworld a company with the same incorporators as DEALCO Farms, Inc. Exactly why will they do that, the contract stipulates they remit 1%, rental payments and other obligations to the city which they failed for the past 8 years despite earning billions of pesos each year of operation. According to Lim they DEALCO Farms, Inc., failed to remit over P46 million in supposed city revenue from the slaughterhouse for the past eight years. Now why will they transfer the lease to another company that they also own? No, I did not say for hanky panky but one thing is sure this will be part of the complaint to be filed with the Ombudsman against Dennis Alcoreza for conflict of interest. How this will play out in Merceditas Gutierrez Ombudsman dismal conviction records remains to be seen but then again, this is Alfredo Lim they are dealing with so let us see.
Well, on the modernizing part of the contract they actually did by installing a spacious fitness gym and recreation center. Wow, good job like the workers need exercise in their back breaking job so maybe the purpose was for the pigs and cows to be fit and have some fun before they are slaughtered? Not! Guess who benefits from the “modernization” that has nothing to do with the abattoir but the owners and officers of both firms owned by the same people.
The city council members showing tribal partisanship at its worse wants a recall against Mayor Alfredo Lim, and should they succeed this is one for the books. It will be a triumph for deadbeats and open conflict of interest what with the number of deadbeats Lim inherited from the former Talibani Mayor Lito Atienza. The City Treasurer Erlinda Marteja in her report to Mayor Alfredo Lim said the city has conducted 29 auctions after issuing warrant of levy against those with outstanding obligations to the city. She said in the first batch of those covered by warrants of levy, there were 100 delinquent taxpayers. The second batch has 300, Marteja said. Maybe the council members should reconsider their position but then again there seems to be no clear demarcation line that separates private interest and public interest in a political system gone awry.
My money is on Alfredo Lim but what makes me wonder is had there been no drama will the city even bother to run after Dennis Alcoreza for conflict of interest and graft charges? If Dennis Alcoreza can openly do this as if they are not in violation of the graft and corrupt practices, how many more like him are out there doing the same treating the crime as SOP? It appears that Mayor Lim is willing to "settle" the matter on the condition that Alcoreza's firm pay their dues, the only problem here is and I hope the "settle part" Lim refers to is all about personal differences. If the complaint the city filed with the Ombudsman is proven then it is not for Lim to decide because the violation was against the taxpaying citizens of Manila for which the culprit should be held responsible and accountable.
Is this a human rights violation issue? I don't think so, perhaps we can say it is a cheap shot not even on a very long shot. If there is any rights violated here it is definitely not the owners and officers of DEALCO Farms, Inc. but the meat dealers and the consumers for exposing them to health hazards due to the unsanitary condition of the facilities. They defied and dared the police to drag and carry them out physically and willfully preventing the police to enforce their lawful order so they got what they deserve....... no wonder the left is having a fit or maybe these politicians are not paying attention or greed takes the better of them when they hear them repeatedly shout Down with Bureaucrat Capitalism!
Filipinos Human Rights Philippine PoliticsPolitics pinoyblogosphere pbs pinoy blogosphere philippineblogosphere pbs philippine blogosphere
21 Speak Out:
The thing is the Alcorezas won a PR coup with those newsclips of cops carrying them out. If I didn't read your piece I would have thought Lim was doing his usual Dirty Harry routine against political enemies.
If I were to advise Lim, I would have told him to lay the prop groundwork before moving in on the abattoir: Plant a few exposes on unsanitary conditions, non-payment of taxes, and incestuous arrangements before moving in to shut it down.
They sure did MB, I was also under the same impression until I did a little research and found out otherwise.
This is basically what is wrong with our pathetic politics based on personal loyalties and a print and broadcast media that sadly are practitioners of ATM Journalism.
This is similar to your blog entry on the anomaly at Enrile's turf having the gall to present his son-in-law as if it was normal for the family to get involve in businesses where there is a clear conflict of interest...... in developed societies they call that graft & corruption but not in the Philippines.
mataas ang recovery percentage ng ganyang business kasi pagkain yan hindi matagal para maibenta,kung tutuo naman na talagang hindi dsila nagbabayad ng tamang tax tiganan maige ang libro na puedeng doktorin ng accountant nila,nag serve din sila via DR malamang na hindi lalabas as benta.ang alam ko pati pasueldo nila hindi tama under minimum sila.check nyo Mayor Lim.nagpapaawa lang yan meron pa sila na mga business siguro yan.pati yung kapatid nya may meat business din pero hindi nagbabayad ng tax.yung meatworks ang pangalan ng business.
dapat kung talagang gusto nyang magserve sa mga tao ng manila di po ba dapat hindi siya nagwork sa iba,dapat nuong nanalo si dennis umalis siyang bilang presidente ng MEATWORLD at iba pang company ng pamilya nila.pero hindi siya parin ang pumipirma ng mga cheke nila.ano pa balak nyo mangurakot din at dagdagan pa ang pera nyo samantalang hindi nga kayo maayos magpasueldo ng tao at walang ibang benipisyo ang mgatao nyo.mga mandaraya kayo sa tao ng MAYNILA.
GOOD JOB MAYOR LIM MARAMI PA PO NA GANYANG MGA NEGOSYANTE.YUNG KAPATID PO NI DENNIS ALCOREZA MEAT DEALER DIN HINDI DIN NAGBABAYAD NG TAX PINIPILI LANG YUNG MGA CUSTOMER NA IISSUEHAN NG INVOICE PARA MABABA ANG LALABAS NA BENTA NYA.TIGNAN NYO PO MAIGE.
With due respect, get your facts straight. Have you seen the slaughterhouse prior to the rehabilitation and after that? If you don't, then you dont have any business talking about stuff you dont know about. Dealco rehabilitated that filthy slaughterhouse to what is it today. My parents who are meatdealers are witnessed to this transformation.
Because of their alliance with Atienza, they are now being punished by Lim. As simple as that! Non-payment of taxes? Common! do you really believe Lim and his dogs when they say the reason why he took-over is just that?? You must be naive if not plain stupid to believe that. Based from the facts which are not disputed, there is no final computation of taxes that is why Dealco or even the City itself do not know exactly how much the tax is!
Another thing, where in the world will you see a violation of a contract leading to an extra judicial takeover? A total disrespect to the courts! Only in the Philippines!!!
When Dennis Alcoreza pleaded Mayor Lim and his dogs for a public debate regarding the issue, why did the Mayor backed out? The reason is that he knows that he would not be able to hide from the truth.
With regard to the Ombudsman case filed against Lim, Im quite sure nothing will happen because Lim will use his political maneuverings once again. Just like what he does to the media wherein he is known to have used his influence to project a good image.
Anyway,this is a clear case of rent-seeking. These are among the reasons why businesses refuse to deal with the government.... and this is the reason why our country is definitely going straight to the pits!
Again, get your facts straight.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABiO62tBUuE
Ok anonymous, I have seen the video highlighting the side of the Alcoreza's which unfortunately is too slanted favoring the sides of the Alcorezas.
The fact is Dennis is a councilman who owns a company that deals directly with the city, a clear case of conflict of interest which the video obviously left out.
As MB has aptly put it, it is a PR coup...... a PR coup does not necessarily mean one who wins it is in the right.
Quote: "The fact is Dennis is a councilman who owns a company that deals directly with the city, a clear case of conflict of interest which the video obviously left out."
Again bro, get your facts straight. The lease agreement was signed years before Alcoreza became a councilor. And it was made by the city council which is composed of a lot of councilors not only by one person. If you know how a council resolution works, you will understand that a single councilor is powerless if not backed up by dozens of his colleagues, the vice mayor and the Mayor. Practically, a councilor is acts inconsequentially so don't tell us he can influence it, if in fact he was already a councilor when the contract was ratified, which again as I've said, he was not yet.
PR coup if you may but then how can they air their side if Lim has already asked the media not to allow the Alcoreza's to air there side? I was informed by a person in a prominent newspaper that there was an "informal order" to the newspapers to block paid ads. Now, do you think a mere councilor can do anything about that?
I would be very glad to continue to have this exchange of views with you as long as it is going to be factual and relevant.
Nakasuhan daw ng graft si Alcoreza pero hanggang ngayon wala pa ding summons na dumadating! Ibig sabihin, pakitang tao lang ni Lim at ng city yun para mapakita na may kasalanan talaga si Alcoreza. Ang dahilan nito ay walang basehan ang mga akusasyon ni Lim! Pakita lang yun na kunyari mag-fifile sya kasi alam nya papalag ang mga yan at maglalakas ng loob na mag-file laban sa kanya sa Ombudsman.
Conflict of interest daw ang ground laban kya Alcoreza? hahahaha!!!! alam nyo ba na isang kuto lang ang isang konsehal sa kabila ng milyon-milyon pang ibang kuto? Walang kapangyarihan ang isang kuto! Lahat ng kanyang kilos ay dapat sang-ayunan ng konseho.
Graft and corruption? Mas maganda siguro kung tingnan muna ni Lim ang bakuran nya. Yung anak nya pusher pero wala ding nangyari. Nakapag-bail kahit na non-bailable offense kaya galit na galit ang PEDEA. Yun ang ehemplo ng kapangyarihan!
Anonymous,
Delicadeza indeed is dead in the Philippines..... the ethical thing to do is to resign his position in the company that has or is presently has a dealing with the city government. It does not matter whether the company has the contract before Dennis Alcoreza's election he has to resign and not involve himself in the business.
Tell me what exactly is the purpose of sub-leasing the facility to a company that is owned by Dennis Alcoreza.
I am glad that you are inclined to continue this exchange in the interest of truth. I suggest you tone down on being personal and let us do this in a civil manner unlike the scandalous Vitas affair complete with tele-novela drama.
We're losing track of the issue. The issue is the propriety of the take-over not whether or not the councilor should have resigned from the company.
Anonymous,
Dennis Alcoreza's unethical position as a Manila councilor and majority owner of meatworld sub-leasing from a company owned by the father who in turn have a contract with the city is part of the issue.
We can't be selective on what we want to be "wrong" because in the end it only exacerbate the problem.
The take-over is all a PR tele-novela blitz which could have been avoided but they have chosen to be carried out thus the drama.
Subleasing in the Vitas Slaughterhouse has been the practice since time immemorial for your information. Meatworld is just one of the several meat dealers who are allowed to sublease not contractually but by custom. Even before the contract, the city has been leasing (although informally) certain premises of the slaughterhouse to meat dealers.
I agree that having a potential conflict of interest is part of the issue but I have to emphasize that that is not the MAIN ISSUE. The main issue in this case is whether or not there was in fact a violation in the lease agreement between the city and DEALCO.
I am just surprised that you seem to agree with Mayor Lim that the determination of whether or not there was a contractual violation is for him to decide and not for the courts.
That kind of disposition is dangerous to the existence of civil society.
Granting that the take-over was a "PR telenovela bliz", it worked for them. Otherwise, the arbitrary actions of the Mayor would have gone unnoticed just like a lot of incidents before that went unrecorded. We might not be even talking about it now but thanks to people like you who care about Philippine politics no matter how disgusting it is, we now are.
Just because it is a "common practice" it does not necessarily mean that it is ethical and right.
I will have to disagree on your contention that this is just a "potential conflict of interest" but clearly a conflict of interest plain and simple.
I am not siding with Lim, I don't know him on a personal level nor do I agree with him per se. This is similar to Asiong Salongat and son Jinggoy Estrada complaining about the "injustice" when they are not clean either..... the pot calling the kettle black I suppose. Fer cryin' out loud, what's up with the tantrum of being singled out when DEALCO is not the only establishment taken over by city hall.
Lim reiterated that he is willing to "settle" as long as they pay what they owe..... P46Million which if you have noticed I am leery as long as it is on a personal level and leave the legal question for the courts to decide. Again this was simply left out in the propaganda disguised as "news" of Joyce Alcoreza who if you have noticed seems to be reading a prompter on a "well written" account of their side.
I am not being personal... maybe you are :)
Anyway, about the settlement, the reason why there is an offer of settlement is because Mayor Lim finally realized he and his dogs f#*c#d up. I don't think DEALCO will be amenable to the settlement considering the fact that they have been damaged irreparably by the Mayor.
By the way, I am confused with your position as to the role of the courts.
On the one hand, you agree with the extrajudicial takeover on the basis of breach of contract. On the other hand, you said and I quote:
"Lim reiterated that he is willing to "settle" as long as they pay what they owe..... P46Million which if you have noticed I am leery as long as it is on a personal level and leave the legal question for the courts to decide."
Leave the legal question for the courts to decide? Mayor Lim has already pre-empted courts when on the basis of a breach of contract, he ordered an extra-judicial takeover!
And what is wrong with reading the account of what happened in front of the camera if that is the way one could explain his/her side better? These are ordinary businessmen and not public personalities like Mayor Lim who are used to situations like these.
Now who is, as you repetitively said, being "personal"?
Below is a quote from the my original entry for your reference:
"It appears that Mayor Lim is willing to "settle" the matter on the condition that Alcoreza's firm pay their dues, the only problem here is and I hope the "settle part" Lim refers to is all about personal differences. If the complaint the city filed with the Ombudsman is proven then it is not for Lim to decide because the violation was against the taxpaying citizens of Manila for which the culprit should be held responsible and accountable."
When I say I don't know Lim on a personal level it means exactly that and has no bearing on what you are insinuating that I am taking this exchange on a personal level..... meaning to be precise is that I look at this incident in a very objective manner as i could.
Give me something that is compelling enough if your purpose is to change my views on the matter. I don't think the argument presented by Joyce Alcoreza's scripted "news" is enough to shed light on the issue as she left out too many important details.
Please answer this very simple question (which is basically the point I want to convey):
1. Do you agree that an extra-judicial takeover (which means that it is up for a party to a contract to determine the existence of a breach) for a supposed breach of contract is proper? Would it not render the courts inutile?
sa palagay ko me katwiran si anonymous. yung kapitbahay namin, empleyado ng manila city hall. natatawa sya kasi imbento lang daw yata ni lim yung utang ng dealco. wala naman daw sa rekord ng city treasurers office yung 46 million na yun.
pero anonymous, wag mo sana masamain ang payo ko... tingin ko sayang ang pagod mo sa pag-post mo ng message sa blog na ito dahil sa simula pa lang obvious na na pinalagay na ng blogger na tama ang diga sa press ni lim. di na kailangan ng matalinong tao para makitang nagtatakip-butas lang ang city hall sa pinaggagagawa nila. hehehe
This is not a question of whether I agree with the "extra judicial" takeover of City Hall of city property but a question in the interest of the taxpaying public of Manila.
Rationalizing one side is just a case of the kettle calling the pot black and until these politicians abide by the rules and stop treating themselves above the law incidents like these will stay with us.
Politics in the Philippines is all about personal loyalty and vested interest and I am not about to take sides based on their Mafiosi mob style. The interest of the people is what counts and their quarrel only highlights and exposed how they pervert the political system.
As to anonymous in Laguna stating that there is no records "Daw" of the P46M owed to the city, I don't think that is compelling enough to drive home a point. The city treasurer not some city hall "employee" has the authority to issue a statement whether there is a record or not of what DEALCO owes.
On another note it will help to use the Name/URL instead of just using anonymous which will allow you to post without filling in the URL so that it does not appear you are talking to yourself.
Quote: "Please answer this very simple question (which is basically the point I want to convey):
1. Do you agree that an extra-judicial takeover (which means that it is up for a party to a contract to determine the existence of a breach) for a supposed breach of contract is proper? Would it not render the courts inutile?"
A simple but important question left unanswered is tantamount to an admission. And if that is the case, I humbly rest my case.
......for now. hehehe! :)
Ok, you can now report to Dennis and Joyce that you "won" the argument on the grounds of selective perception of what is "right" and "wrong."
The issue of whether Lim abused his executive prerogative will be decided by the courts, that is if the Alcoreza's filed a case on the takeover. In effect it does not matter whether we believe it is right or wrong until the court render an opinion. In the same manner that the Ombudsman will decide whether Dennis is guilty of charges brought up by Lim.
Post a Comment